lp-a.org

Lipoprotein(a): the evidence, the trials, the guidance. Curated for clinicians, dated, linked to the source.

1609 studies (119 landmark), 10 trials tracked, 10 guideline documents, 12 Radcliffe videos. Updated 18 August 2026.

What is due

  1. ESC Congress 2026, MünchenUpcoming
  2. Lp(a)HORIZON topline result (pelacarsen)Awaited: guided to Q2 2026 by Novartis and Ionis, not announced as of mid-August 2026
  3. European Commission decision on obicetrapib (Ubeslo, Evlarco)Expected H2 2026 after the positive CHMP opinion of 24 July 2026
  4. AHA Scientific Sessions 2026Upcoming
  5. PREVAIL outcomes result (obicetrapib)Interim analysis Q4 2026, results expected Q1 2027
  6. EAS Congress 2027Upcoming

The full timeline

Outcomes trials

TrialAgentNStatusRegistry
Lp(a)HORIZONPelacarsen8,323Completed, results awaited
OCEAN(a)-OutcomesOlpasiran7,297Ongoing, primary completion March 2028
ACCLAIM-Lp(a)Lepodisiran17,300Ongoing, enrolment complete, primary completion March 2029
MOVE-Lp(a) (muvalaplin outcomes)Muvalaplin10,450Recruiting, primary completion March 2031

All 10 trials in the tracker · The agents

Just happened

  1. CHMP positive opinion for obicetrapib (Ubeslo) and obicetrapib/ezetimibe (Evlarco)
  2. Lp(a)FRONTIERS APHERESIS published: pelacarsen replaces apheresis
  3. 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidemia guideline published

Latest evidence

The library: 1609 studies by topic · Archive by year

Video from Radcliffe Cardiology

All 12 videos · Podcasts

Landmark canon

Guidance

Practical questions

Whom should I test for Lp(a), and how often?

Every adult, at least once in a lifetime: that is the recommendation of the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, the 2022 EAS consensus statement, the 2021 Canadian guidelines, the 2024 NLA update and the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety guideline. Because plasma Lp(a) is more than 90 percent genetically determined and stable over decades, one measurement usually settles it; repeat only when a value sits close to a decision threshold, after menopause, in kidney disease, or when a new therapy is started. Cascade testing of first-degree relatives is recommended when the index value is high.

Which unit, mg/dL or nmol/L?

Prefer nmol/L on an isoform-insensitive assay: it counts particles, and apo(a) size varies so much between people that mass units mislead. Conversion is only approximate; a flat factor of 2.0 to 2.5 misclassifies about one in ten patients around trial thresholds, and the Copenhagen conversion formula does better (Lp(a)HORIZON screening data, 2026). Quote whatever unit the laboratory reported and do not convert for a decision if you can re-measure instead.

What counts as high?

Risk is continuous. Common markers: below 30 mg/dL (75 nmol/L) low; 50 mg/dL (125 nmol/L) the traditional risk-enhancer threshold used by most guidelines; 70 mg/dL (about 150 nmol/L) the Lp(a)HORIZON entry level; 90 mg/dL and 175 to 200 nmol/L the entry levels of the other outcomes trials; above 180 mg/dL (about 430 nmol/L) a lifetime risk equivalent to heterozygous FH. About one in five adults is above 50 mg/dL; distributions differ by ancestry, the risk per nmol/L largely does not.

What lowers Lp(a) today?

Statins do not (they raise it 8 to 20 percent), nor do ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, fibrates or omega-3 fatty acids. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies lower it 20 to 30 percent and inclisiran about 22 percent; CETP inhibition (obicetrapib) about 37 percent; niacin about 37 percent but without outcome benefit; lipoprotein apheresis 60 to 70 percent per session. None of these is an Lp(a) therapy. What works today is intensive control of everything else, LDL-C first, because Lp(a) and LDL-C risk are independent and additive.